Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine · 2025
Comparison of dose distribution with and without reflecting heterogeneous boron distribution using 18F-BPA positron emission tomography in boron neutron capture therapy.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kobayashi Yuta, Nakamura Satoshi, Takemori Mihiro, Nakaichi Tetsu, Shuto Yasunori, Ito Kimiteru, Takahashi Kana, Kashihara Tairo, Yonemura Miki, Endo Hana, Kunito Kouji, Okamoto Hiroyuki, Chiba Takahito, Nakayama Hiroki, Oshika Riki, Kishida Hironori, Itami Jun, Kurihara Hiroaki, Igaki Hiroshi
Аннотация
This study investigated the dosimetric impact of implementing heterogeneous boron distribution into dose evaluations on tumors in BNCT. The study involved 27 patients who underwent 18F-BPA PET/CT scans. Dose evaluations were performed using various methods reflecting boron concentrations on CT images. The conventional dose evaluations, which reflected uniform boron concentration in blood of 25 ppm and a constant tumor-to-blood (T/B) ratio of 3.5, were compared with individual dose evaluations, which reflected the blood boron concentration and T/B ratio calculated from 18F-BPA in each patient. The heterogeneous tumoral dose distribution was also compared, revealing the dosimetric impact of the boron distribution calculated from each voxel of 18F-BPA. The spatial correspondence between 18F-BPA and dose distribution was compared using metabolic tumor volume (MTV) from 18F-BPA and isodose volume from the heterogeneous dose distribution. Results showed that the median blood boron concentration and T/B ratio calculated from 18F-BPA were 25.57 (23.90-27.84) ppm and 3.75 (2.54-4.59), respectively, comparable to those in the conventional dose evaluations. All dose indices in the heterogeneous tumoral dose evaluations were significantly lower than those in the conventional dose evaluations (p < 0.01). However, the spatial correspondence between the 18F-BPA and the dose distribution was not observed in the dice similarity coefficients of both MTV40-40% isodose volume and MTV50-50% isodose volume. In conclusion, the study confirmed the validity of applying the boron concentration calculated from 18F-BPA to the dose evaluation for a patient in BNCT. The differences might be associated with non-inter-patient variations of 18F-BPA, but the conventional dose evaluations mainly focused on the high boron concentration area within the tumor. Furthermore, the discrepancies in the patients were also observed between the 18F-BPA distribution and the heterogeneous dose distribution. Therefore, this study suggested that the indications for BNCT should consider not only 18F-BPA but also the dose distributions, which could reflect the heterogeneous tumoral boron distribution.