MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/iju.13916

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2019

Comparison of perioperative outcomes between open and minimally invasive nephroureterectomy: A population-based analysis.

Nazzani Sebastiano, Bazinet Amélie, Preisser Felix, Mazzone Elio, Tian Zhe, Mistretta Francesco A, Shariat Shahrokh F, Saad Fred, Zorn Kevin C, Montanari Emanuele, Briganti Alberto, Carmignani Luca, Karakiewicz Pierre I

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To examine intraoperative and postoperative morbidity and mortality, as well as the impact on length of stay and total hospital charges of minimally invasive nephroureterectomy compared with open nephroureterectomy in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

METHODS

Within the National Inpatient Sample (2008-2013), we identified patients with non-metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with either minimally invasive nephroureterectomy or open nephroureterectomy. We relied on inverse probability of treatment weighting to reduce the effect of inherent differences between open nephroureterectomy versus minimally invasive nephroureterectomy. Multivariable logistic regression, multivariable Poisson regression models and multivariable linear regression models were used.

RESULTS

Between 2008 and 2013, we identified 3897 patients treated with either minimally invasive nephroureterectomy (1093 [28%]) or open nephroureterectomy (2804 [72%]). In multivariable logistic regression models, minimally invasive nephroureterectomy resulted in lower rates of overall (odds ratio 0.71, P < 0.001), wound (odds ratio 0.49, P = 0.01), intraoperative (odds ratio 0.55, P = 0.01), miscellaneous surgical (odds ratio 0.64, P = 0.008) and miscellaneous medical complications (odds ratio 0.77, P = 0.002). Furthermore, minimally invasive nephroureterectomy was associated with lower rates of transfusions (odds ratio 0.61, P < 0.001). In multivariable Poisson regression models, minimally invasive nephroureterectomy was associated with shorter length of stay (relative risk 0.88, P < 0.001). Finally, higher total hospital charges ($2500 more per patient) were recorded for minimally invasive nephroureterectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative and postoperative morbidity, as well as length of stay, but not total hospital charges favor minimally invasive nephroureterectomy over open nephroureterectomy. These outcomes validate the safety and feasibility of minimally invasive nephroureterectomy in select upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients.

Для цитирования: Nazzani Sebastiano, Bazinet Amélie, Preisser Felix, Mazzone Elio, Tian Zhe, Mistretta Francesco A, Shariat Shahrokh F, Saad Fred, Zorn Kevin C, Montanari Emanuele, Briganti Alberto, Carmignani Luca, Karakiewicz Pierre I. Comparison of perioperative outcomes between open and minimally invasive nephroureterectomy: A population-based analysis.. International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association. 2019. DOI: 10.1111/iju.13916.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.