MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jbmt.2014.08.002

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of bodywork and movement therapies · 2014

Conservative treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: comparison between laser therapy and Fascial Manipulation(®).

Pratelli Elisa, Pintucci Marco, Cultrera Pina, Baldini Enrico, Stecco Antonio, Petrocelli Antonio, Pasquetti Pietro

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The etiopathogenesis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) is multifactorial and most cases are classified as idiopathic (Thurston 2013). A randomized controlled trial was performed to compare the effectiveness of Fascial Manipulation(®) (FM) and Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) for CTS. This prospective trial included 42 patients (70 hands with symptoms) with clinical and electroneuromyographic diagnosis of CTS. The patients were randomly assigned to receive multiple sessions of FM or multiple session of LLLT. The Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) and Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) were performed at baseline, end of treatment and after three months. The group that received FM showed a significant reduction in subjective pain perception and an increased function assessed by BCTQ at the end of the treatment and follow-up. The group that received LLLT showed an improvement in the BCTQ at the end of the treatment but the improvement level was not sustained at the three month follow-up. FM is a valid alternative treatment for CTS.

Для цитирования: Pratelli Elisa, Pintucci Marco, Cultrera Pina, Baldini Enrico, Stecco Antonio, Petrocelli Antonio, Pasquetti Pietro. Conservative treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: comparison between laser therapy and Fascial Manipulation(®).. Journal of bodywork and movement therapies. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2014.08.002.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.