Carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnosis by means of median nerve elasticity--improved diagnostic accuracy of US with sonoelastography.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare the elasticity of the median nerve (MN) between healthy volunteers and patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and to evaluate the diagnostic utility of sonoelastographic measurements of the elasticity of the MN.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
This study was performed with institutional review board approval and written informed consent from all participants. Hands in 22 healthy volunteers and in 31 patients with symptomatic CTS were studied. The cross-sectional area (CSA) and the elasticity of the MN, which was measured as the acoustic coupler (AC)/MN strain ratio, were evaluated.
RESULTS
Both hands in 22 healthy volunteers (three men [mean age, 52.7 years; age range, 41-65 years]; 19 women [mean age, 62.2 years; age range, 40-88 years]) and 43 hands in 31 patients with symptomatic CTS (three men [mean age, 69.0 years; age range, 46-88 years]; 28 women [mean age, 61.2 years; age range, 39-92 years]) were studied. Both the AC/MN strain ratio and the CSA in the patients with CTS were significantly higher than those in the healthy volunteers (P < .001). The presence of CTS was predicted by means of AC/MN strain ratio and CSA cutoff values, respectively, of 4.3 and 11 mm(2), with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of 0.78 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69, 0.88) and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.78, 0.93). A logistic model that combined the AC/MN strain ratio and the CSA improved diagnostic accuracy for CTS, with an AUC of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.97; P < .001).
CONCLUSION
Sonoelastography provides significant improvement in the diagnostic accuracy of the ultrasonographic assessment of CTS.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.