MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Revista medica de Chile · 1991

[Percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty as a treatment of choice for mitral stenosis. Immediate results and long-term follow-up].

Olmos A, Gajardo J, Lecannelier E, Seguel I, Lama A, Otero C, Fasce E

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

We evaluated 77 patients with symptomatic mitral stenosis for balloon valvuloplasty. Five patients were excluded from the procedure due to the presence of intra-atrial thrombi or mitral valve endocarditis as detected by 2D echocardiography. The mean age of the 72 treated patients was 38 +/- 11 years, 68 were NYHA functional class II or IV: only 6 patients had valvular calcification. Three patients had severe liver failure, 2 were chronic alcoholics, one had liver cirrhosis, 2 had severe weight loss and 13 had pulmonary hypertension at systemic levels. 69 patients had a technically adequate procedure, one patient died, 1 developed cardiac tamponade and 1 failed. Mitral valve area increased from 0.93 +/- 0.34 to 2.38 +/- 0.67 cm2. Mitral incompetence increased in only 16 patients. After a mean follow up period of 15 +/- 5 months (range 8 to 27), 56 patients remained in FC I or II. Mitral valve area remained satisfactory in 54 patients. Mitral valve anatomy evaluated by echocardiography is helpful to predict immediate and late outcome. We conclude that balloon mitral valvuloplasty is the first choice for patients with severe symptomatic mitral stenosis.

Для цитирования: Olmos A, Gajardo J, Lecannelier E, Seguel I, Lama A, Otero C, Fasce E. [Percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty as a treatment of choice for mitral stenosis. Immediate results and long-term follow-up].. Revista medica de Chile. 1991.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.