Acute, in-Hospital Outcome of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for In-Stent Chronic Total Occlusion.

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of total chronic total occlusion (CTO) still remains a major challenge in interventional cardiology. Recanalization of in-stent CTO (IS-CTO) is associated with inferior success rates. This present study aims to comparatively evaluate the acute outcome of patients with IS-CTO and de novo CTO.

METHODS

Between 2012 and 2018 we included 600 patients. Antegrade and retrograde CTO-PCI techniques were used and the primary endpoint was a composite safety endpoint comprising in-hospital death, vascular complications, cardiac tamponade, stroke and acute myocardial infarction.

RESULTS

IS-CTO predominantly occurred in the right coronary artery (71.2%). The success (p = 0.495) and complication rates (p = 0.255) were independent of the target vessel. The lesion lengths of IS-CTO were longer than in de-novo CTO (40 mm vs. 30 mm, statistical trend p = 0.081) alongside with the implanted stent lengths (76 mm vs. 63 mm, statistical trend p = 0.070) and their diameter (3.5 mm vs. 3.0 mm, p < 0.001). We determined that procedural and fluoroscopy time were longer in patients with IS-CTO (115.0 min vs. 93.0 min, p = 0.018 and 40.0 min vs. 30.0 min, p = 0.040) and that in this group of patients the amount of contrast medium was higher (250 ml vs. 200 ml, p = 0.015). Overall success rates were comparable between the two group of patients (87.9% vs. 84.4%, p = 0.586). In-hospital, acute procedural complications regarding the composite safety were rare and showed no statistically significant difference (3.0% vs. 5.6%; p = 0.563).

CONCLUSIONS

Recanalization of in-stent CTO lesions go along with long procedural and high fluoroscopy times as well as an increased amount of contrast medium. Compared to de novo CTO they can be performed safe in experienced hands with similar success rates.