Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2020
Randomized Pragmatic Trial of Stroke Transitional Care: The COMPASS Study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеPragmatic Clinical TrialПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Duncan Pamela W, Bushnell Cheryl D, Jones Sara B, Psioda Matthew A, Gesell Sabina B, D'Agostino Ralph B, Sissine Mysha E, Coleman Sylvia W, Johnson Anna M, Barton-Percival Blair F, Prvu-Bettger Janet, Calhoun Adrienne G, Cummings Doyle M, Freburger Janet K, Halladay Jacqueline R, Kucharska-Newton Anna M, Lundy-Lamm Gladys, Lutz Barbara J, Mettam Laurie H, Pastva Amy M, Xenakis James G, Ambrosius Walter T, Radman Meghan D, Vetter Betsy, Rosamond Wayne D, COMPASS Site Investigators and Teams.
Аннотация
Background The objectives of this study were to develop and test in real-world clinical practice the effectiveness of a comprehensive postacute stroke transitional care (TC) management program. Methods and Results The COMPASS study (Comprehensive Post-Acute Stroke Services) was a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial where the hospital was the unit of randomization. The intervention (COMPASS-TC) was initiated at 20 hospitals, and 20 hospitals provided their usual care. Hospital staff enrolled 6024 adult stroke and transient ischemic attack patients discharged home between 2016 and 2018. COMPASS-TC was patient-centered and assessed social and functional determinates of health to inform individualized care plans. Ninety-day outcomes were evaluated by blinded telephone interviewers. The primary outcome was functional status (Stroke Impact Scale-16); secondary outcomes were mortality, disability, medication adherence, depression, cognition, self-rated health, fatigue, care satisfaction, home blood pressure monitoring, and falls. The primary analysis was intention to treat. Of intervention hospitals, 58% had uninterrupted intervention delivery. Thirty-five percent of patients at intervention hospitals attended a COMPASS clinic visit. The primary outcome was measured for 59% of patients and was not significantly influenced by the intervention. Mean Stroke Impact Scale-16 (±SD) was 80.6±21.1 in TC versus 79.9±21.4 in usual care. Home blood pressure monitoring was self-reported by 72% of intervention patients versus 64% of usual care patients (adjusted odds ratio, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.21-1.70]). No other secondary outcomes differed. Conclusions Although designed according to the best available evidence with input from various stakeholders and consistent with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services TC policies, the COMPASS model of TC was not consistently incorporated into real-world health care. We found no significant effect of the intervention on functional status at 90 days post-discharge. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02588664.