MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00276-013-1239-5

Медицинская библиотека · Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2013

Persistent primitive olfactory artery: CT angiographic diagnosis and literature review for classification and clinical significance.

Kim Myoung Soo, Lee Ghi Jai

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of a persistent primitive olfactory artery (POA) and to review the literatures focusing on the classification and clinical significance of this variant.

DESIGN

To identify cases with persistent POA, we reviewed the records of computed tomography (CT) angiography performed on 3,067 patients in our institution from January 1, 2011 to August 31, 2013. Literatures on the incidence and classification of a persistent POA were reviewed.

RESULTS

Among these patients, eight were diagnosed with a persistent POA (five men, three women, aged 44-82 years), an incidence of 0.26 %. Six persistent POAs terminated as a distal anterior cerebral artery (ACA) and two as a distal middle cerebral artery. Previous studies applied similar definitions for the classification of persistent POA; however, there has been confusion on the definition of variant 2.

CONCLUSION

In our institution, the incidence of persistent POA seen on CT angiography was 0.26 %. An artery with its embryological course along the olfactory bulb should be classified as a persistent POA and differentiated from dural artery from ACA.

Для цитирования: Kim Myoung Soo, Lee Ghi Jai. Persistent primitive olfactory artery: CT angiographic diagnosis and literature review for classification and clinical significance.. Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA. 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s00276-013-1239-5.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.