MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.21733

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2011

Safety and feasibility of elective minimally invasive video-assisted central neck dissection for thyroid carcinoma.

Neidich Marci J, Steward David L

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) is accepted as treatment for select patients with thyroid carcinoma. We report both benefits and limitations of elective central neck dissection performed with the MIVAT technique.

METHODS

Patients undergoing elective central neck dissection with MIVAT during November 2006 to October 2009 were studied retrospectively. Outcomes included complications and recurrence rates.

RESULTS

In all, 28 patients were studied. There were no recurrences, with median follow-up of 14 months. Eleven patients (39%) had positive central lymph nodes for metastases. No permanent hypocalcemia resulted, although 3 patients (10.7%) experienced transient hypocalcemia on postoperative day 1 (Ca <8 mg/dL). No permanent hypoparathyroidism resulted, although 7 patients (25%) had transient hypoparathyroidism (postanesthesia care unit parathyroid hormone [PTH] <8 mg/dL) treated with short-term supplementation. Transient recurrent laryngeal nerve paresis occurred in 1 patient (3.6%). At the most recent check, 91% of patients had low/undetectable (<1 ng/mL) thyroglobulin.

CONCLUSIONS

Elective central neck dissection performed with MIVAT is a safe and feasible procedure in our institutional experience.

Для цитирования: Neidich Marci J, Steward David L. Safety and feasibility of elective minimally invasive video-assisted central neck dissection for thyroid carcinoma.. Head & neck. 2011. DOI: 10.1002/hed.21733.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.