Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
Secondary Traumatic Stress in Addiction Professionals: A Mixed Research Synthesis.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gkremou M, Missouridou E, Fradelos E, Koutelekos I, Parissopoulos S
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Addiction professionals are affected by the traumas experienced by the individuals and the families they care for.
AIM: The aim of this study is the synthesis of research on the impact of Secondary Traumatic Stress (STS) on healthcare professionals working in the field of addiction.
METHODOLOGY: A mixed research synthesis of studies published in English from January 1, 2010, through June 10, 2024. The research was conducted using electronic databases, with keywords related to secondary trauma in the field of addiction. Out of 44 initially identified studies, 9 were selected that met the inclusion criteria.
RESULTS: The results indicated that healthcare professionals working in the field of addiction experience considerable levels of STS. Three themes were derived from the synthesis of qualitative research studies: (a). "Opening the Pandora's Box," (b). "Defensive practice versus connecting and maintaining boundaries," and (c). "New paths in personal and professional development." Professionals in the landscape of addiction trauma and loss experience significant negative transformations in their experiences with themselves, others, and the world, affecting their emotions, thoughts, beliefs, value systems, and worldviews. Notwithstanding, witnessing clients remarkable resilience despite the traumas they endure and crediting clients for shaping their professional practice creates a meaningful space of shared personal growth. Support from colleagues, supervision, and continuous education were identified as critical factors in reducing negative consequences and promoting the professional and personal well-being of drug and alcohol workers.
CONCLUSION: Trauma can be frightening and unbearable for professionals to look at, but being there has a validating quality for the traumatized and creates feelings of safety, hope, and growth for both traumatized individuals and professionals. Maintaining clear boundaries between professional and client serves as a template for the latter's future relationships and is critical for preventing secondary trauma and promoting secondary post-traumatic growth. Overall, addressing secondary trauma requires a holistic approach involving trauma-informed education, self-care, and organizational support.
AIM: The aim of this study is the synthesis of research on the impact of Secondary Traumatic Stress (STS) on healthcare professionals working in the field of addiction.
METHODOLOGY: A mixed research synthesis of studies published in English from January 1, 2010, through June 10, 2024. The research was conducted using electronic databases, with keywords related to secondary trauma in the field of addiction. Out of 44 initially identified studies, 9 were selected that met the inclusion criteria.
RESULTS: The results indicated that healthcare professionals working in the field of addiction experience considerable levels of STS. Three themes were derived from the synthesis of qualitative research studies: (a). "Opening the Pandora's Box," (b). "Defensive practice versus connecting and maintaining boundaries," and (c). "New paths in personal and professional development." Professionals in the landscape of addiction trauma and loss experience significant negative transformations in their experiences with themselves, others, and the world, affecting their emotions, thoughts, beliefs, value systems, and worldviews. Notwithstanding, witnessing clients remarkable resilience despite the traumas they endure and crediting clients for shaping their professional practice creates a meaningful space of shared personal growth. Support from colleagues, supervision, and continuous education were identified as critical factors in reducing negative consequences and promoting the professional and personal well-being of drug and alcohol workers.
CONCLUSION: Trauma can be frightening and unbearable for professionals to look at, but being there has a validating quality for the traumatized and creates feelings of safety, hope, and growth for both traumatized individuals and professionals. Maintaining clear boundaries between professional and client serves as a template for the latter's future relationships and is critical for preventing secondary trauma and promoting secondary post-traumatic growth. Overall, addressing secondary trauma requires a holistic approach involving trauma-informed education, self-care, and organizational support.