Nature communications · 2024
Intersecting social and environmental determinants of multidrug-resistant urinary tract infections in East Africa beyond antibiotic use.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Keenan Katherine, Papathomas Michail, Mshana Stephen E, Asiimwe Benon, Kiiru John, Lynch Andy G, Kesby Mike, Neema Stella, Mwanga Joseph R, Mushi Martha F, Jing Wei, Green Dominique L, Olamijuwon Emmanuel, Zhang Qing, Sippy Rachel, Fredricks Kathryn J, Gillespie Stephen H, Sabiiti Wilber, Bazira Joel, Sloan Derek J, Mmbaga Blandina T, Kibiki Gibson, Aanensen David, Stelling John, Smith V Anne, Sandeman Alison, Holden Matthew T G, HATUA Consortium
Аннотация
The global health crisis of antibacterial resistance (ABR) poses a particular threat in low-resource settings like East Africa. Interventions for ABR typically target antibiotic use, overlooking the wider set of factors which drive vulnerability and behaviours. In this cross-sectional study, we investigated the joint contribution of behavioural, environmental, socioeconomic, and demographic factors associated with higher risk of multi-drug resistant urinary tract infections (MDR UTIs) in Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda. We sampled outpatients with UTI symptoms in healthcare facilities and linked their microbiology data with patient, household and community level data. Using bivariate statistics and Bayesian profile regression on a sample of 1610 individuals, we show that individuals with higher risk of MDR UTIs were more likely to have compound and interrelated social and environmental disadvantages: they were on average older, with lower education, had more chronic illness, lived in resource-deprived households, more likely to have contact with animals, and human or animal waste. This suggests that interventions to tackle ABR need to take account of intersectional socio-environmental disadvantage as a priority.