MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.bandl.2024.105389

Медицинская библиотека · Brain and language · 2024

Sentence-level embeddings reveal dissociable word- and sentence-level cortical representation across coarse- and fine-grained levels of meaning.

Fairhall Scott L

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

In this large-sample (N = 64) fMRI study, sentence embeddings (text-embedding-ada-002, OpenAI) and representational similarity analysis were used to contrast sentence-level and word-level semantic representation. Overall, sentence-level information resulted in a 20-25 % increase in the model's ability to captures neural representation when compared to word-level only information (word-order scrambled embeddings). This increase was relatively undifferentiated across the cortex. However, when coarse-grained (across thematic category) and fine-grained (within thematic category) combinatorial meaning were separately assessed, word- and sentence-level representations were seen to strongly dissociate across the cortex and to do so differently as a function of grain. Coarse-grained sentence-level representations were evident in occipitotemporal, ventral temporal and medial prefrontal cortex, while fine-grained differences were seen in lateral prefrontal and parietal cortex, middle temporal gyrus, the precuneus, and medial prefrontal cortex. This result indicates dissociable cortical substrates underly single concept versus combinatorial meaning and that different cortical regions specialise for fine- and coarse-grained meaning.

Для цитирования: Fairhall Scott L. Sentence-level embeddings reveal dissociable word- and sentence-level cortical representation across coarse- and fine-grained levels of meaning.. Brain and language. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2024.105389.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.