MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0149-7634(01)00055-0

Медицинская библиотека · Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2001

Comparison between two models of experimental anxiety in healthy volunteers and panic disorder patients.

Graeff F G, Silva M, Del Ben C M, Zuardi A W, Hetem L A, Guimarães F S

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

To further investigate the role of serotonin (5-HT) in anxiety, two tests were used in human subjects. The first was the conditioning of skin conductance response (CSCR) that associates a tone to a loud noise. The second was simulated public speaking (SPS), which is believed to represent unconditioned fear. In healthy volunteers the 5-HT(2A) receptor blocker and 5-HT reuptake inhibitor nefazodone reduced subjective anxiety and the number of spontaneous fluctuations of skin conductance during CSCR, but enhanced anxiety induced by SPS. Opposite effects had been reported with the 5-HT releasing and uptake-inhibiting agent D-fenfluramine. Panic patients behaved like controls in the CSCR. However, they had a higher level of baseline anxiety and were insensitive to SPS. This profile resembles the reported effect of the non-selective 5-HT receptor blocker metergoline in healthy volunteers. Therefore, panic patients seem to process unconditioned fear abnormally, which may be due to lack of 5-HT inhibition in brain structures commanding flight from proximal danger stimuli.

Для цитирования: Graeff F G, Silva M, Del Ben C M, Zuardi A W, Hetem L A, Guimarães F S. Comparison between two models of experimental anxiety in healthy volunteers and panic disorder patients.. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews. 2001. DOI: 10.1016/s0149-7634(01)00055-0.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.