Small Intestinal Cavernous Hemangioma Presenting with Recurrent Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Case Report and Narrative Review.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Small intestinal cavernous hemangiomas are rare vascular malformations that present diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to their deep location and propensity for recurrent bleeding. This report aims to describe a case with a sequential management approach and to synthesize existing evidence through a narrative literature review.
CASE PRESENTATION : A 74-year-old female presented with recurrent melena for five months. Initial imaging (gastroscopy, colonoscopy, computed tomography angiography, and computed tomography enterography) revealed no bleeding source. Balloon-assisted enteroscopy identified a 0.6 cm mucosal protrusion 520 cm distal to the pylorus, with active oozing. Endoscopic hemostasis was achieved using metal clip occlusion and lauromacrogol sclerotherapy, following which a biopsy was performed safely to confirm the diagnosis of hemangioma. Six months later, melena recurred, and the patient underwent surgical resection of the same lesion. Pathological examination confirmed a cavernous hemangioma. At two-year follow-up, the patient remained free from recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding.
CONCLUSION
This case highlights the value of balloon-assisted enteroscopy for localizing obscure small intestinal bleeding and achieving temporary hemostasis. While endoscopic intervention facilitates diagnosis and acute bleeding control, surgical resection remains the definitive treatment for selected cases. Close follow-up may be considered to monitor for potential recurrence. A narrative review of the literature supports the rarity of this condition and the limited evidence base for treatment standardization.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.