Improving the performance of biochemical genetic testing through external quality assessment.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
External quality assessment (EQA) is essential for ensuring reliable biochemical genetic testing. This study evaluated long-term performance trends in ERNDIM quantitative EQA schemes, including special assays in serum (SAS), special assays in urine (SAU), purines and pyrimidines in urine (PPU), quantitative organic acids in urine (QTOU), quantitative amino acids in serum (QTAS), acylcarnitines in serum (ACS), and special assays in dried blood spots (SADB).
METHODS
Longitudinal trends in between- and within-laboratory coefficient of variation (CV) and their ratios as indicators of harmonisation were evaluated using ERNDIM EQA annual report data from 2000 to 2024.
RESULTS
Means of between- and within-laboratory CVs differed substantially across schemes. In 2024, between- respective within-laboratory CVs (%) were: QTAS 10;6, SAS 12;7, SAU 14;7, PPU 14;8, ACS 25;10; SABD 26;10, and QTOU 36;17. Marked variability was also observed across individual analytes, particularly for low-concentration metabolites, compounds with specific functional groups, and those analysed without isotopically labelled internal standards. Improvements in CVs were mainly seen in the early years of EQA scheme implementation. No longitudinal trend was observed for QTAS, which consistently showed the best performance.
CONCLUSIONS
The marked variation in performance between schemes and analytes may be linked to differences in analytical methodology, analyte properties, availability of commercial reference materials, sample matrix, and experience. Overall, ERNDIM quantitative schemes effectively monitor performance, support harmonisation, and provide educational feedback.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.