MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/bf02553822

Медицинская библиотека · Diseases of the colon and rectum · 1989

The external anal sphincter. Relationship between anal manometry and anal electromyography and its clinical relevance.

Felt-Bersma R J, Strijers R L, Janssen J J, Visser S L, Meuwissen S G

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Anal manometry and anal electromyography (EMG) were performed in 45 patients to evaluate the external anal sphincter. Their symptoms were soiling (N = 6), incontinence (N = 10), and obstipation (N = 19). Clinical diagnoses were previous anal surgery (N = 16), rectal prolapse--partial, total, intussusception (N = 16), puborectalis syndrome (N = 4), neurologic disorders (N = 3), and others (N = 6). The relationship between the maximum squeeze pressure (MSP) measured with anal manometry and the maximum (voluntary) contraction pattern (MCP) and signs of denervation (DEN) measured with anal EMG were examined. The correlation coefficient between MSP and MCP was 0.55 (P less than .001) and between MSP and DEN 0.13 (NS). A normal MSP always showed a normal MCP, a normal MCP showed an abnormal MSP in 43 percent only. In conclusion, the clinical value of anal EMG seems limited. Assessment of an additional anal EMG seems indicated in incontinent patients with previous anal surgery with a low MSP to estimate muscle function, whenever anal surgery is considered. Anal EMG during straining can easily confirm the clinical diagnosis of puborectalis syndrome.

Для цитирования: Felt-Bersma R J, Strijers R L, Janssen J J, Visser S L, Meuwissen S G. The external anal sphincter. Relationship between anal manometry and anal electromyography and its clinical relevance.. Diseases of the colon and rectum. 1989. DOI: 10.1007/bf02553822.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.