Barriers and facilitators to implementing early intervention for children with non-progressive motor disorders: A systematic review.
Аннотация
AIM: To identify and analyse barriers and facilitators to implementing early motor interventions for children with non-progressive motor disorders, and to propose strategies to enhance scalability and effectiveness.
METHOD: We searched databases including MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PubMed, PsycInfo, and Scopus for studies examining motor interventions for children (≤3 years) with non-progressive motor disorders in any setting. A mixed-methods approach was adopted, and all empirical study designs reporting stakeholders' perspectives were eligible. Included studies were critically appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. A narrative synthesis was undertaken, with extracted barriers and facilitators mapped into the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, normalization process theory, and Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change frameworks to inform implementation strategies.
RESULTS
Twenty-two studies were identified, mainly randomized controlled trial designs. Barriers included intervention complexity, financial constraints, workforce shortages, and infrastructure challenges. Facilitators encompassed intervention adaptability, caregiver engagement, interdisciplinary collaboration, and telehealth accessibility. Framework-informed strategies focus on workforce development, locally supported digital approaches, and family-centred support.
INTERPRETATION: Addressing systemic, organizational, and individual barriers is crucial for effective intervention. Solutions such as readiness assessments, workforce development, and family-centred approaches enhance implementation. Digital integration and professional collaboration improve service accessibility and sustainability.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.