MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/0016-5085(95)90199-x

Медицинская библиотека · Gastroenterology · 1995

The rumination syndrome: clinical features rather than manometric diagnosis.

O'Brien M D, Bruce B K, Camilleri M

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Rumination is infrequent in adults of normal mental capacity. Upper gastrointestinal manometry reportedly confirms the diagnosis. Clinical characteristics, treatment(s), and outcomes of these patients are unclear.

METHODS

We assessed 38 adults and adolescents with rumination between 1987 and 1994. Esophagogastroduodenal manometric recordings (n = 36; 3-hour fasting and 2-hour postprandially) were reviewed; follow-up information was obtained from mailed questionnaires.

RESULTS

Patients saw a mean of five physicians and had symptoms for a mean of 2.75 years before diagnosis. Features included daily, effortless regurgitation of undigested food starting within minutes of meals. Weight loss was substantial (mean, 29 lb) in 42% of patients. Seventeen percent of female patients had a history of bulimia. Manometry confirmed the clinical diagnosis in 33% but was otherwise normal in all. Of 16 patients who responded to our questionnaires of 29 with > 6 months of follow-up (average, 35 months), 12 reported subjective improvement. In 14, the behavior persists.

CONCLUSIONS

The rumination syndrome is underdiagnosed. With typical clinical features, gastroduodenal manometry seems unnecessary to confirm the diagnosis. Diagnosis and reassurance are important in management to avoid unnecessary tests and treatments.

Для цитирования: O'Brien M D, Bruce B K, Camilleri M. The rumination syndrome: clinical features rather than manometric diagnosis.. Gastroenterology. 1995. DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(95)90199-x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.