DOI 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01084.x
Neurotoxicity of intrathecally administered fentanyl in a rat spinal model.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
Intrathecally administered fentanyl rarely causes drug tolerance or formation of inflammatory masses and might therefore be a suitable treatment option for chronic pain. However, the neurotoxicity of intrathecally administered fentanyl remains to be clarified. We examined the histological changes, neurodysfunction, and side effects of intrathecal fentanyl in rats.
DESIGN
The rats received fentanyl at 0.12 µL/g body weight (0, 50, 1000, 2000, and 5000 µg/mL in saline) via an intrathecal catheter. Seven days after the injection, the spinal cord with both roots were removed for histological examination. The neurological function was evaluated by monitoring walking behavior and latencies to radiant heat. Side effects were also recorded.
RESULTS
No histological abnormalities were observed in the spinal cord, anterior and posterior roots, cauda equina nerves, or arachnoid membrane. Formation of white neomembrane was noted around the catheter in some animals, but there was no significant difference in the incidence among the groups. The sensory threshold was significantly higher at 1 and 2 hours after injection in the 50 and 5000 µg/mL groups, respectively. However, there was no significant difference in the sensory threshold among the five groups at 7 days postinjection. All of the rats walked normally within 4 hours even after injection of 5000 µg/mL fentanyl. The incidence of apnea, muscular rigidity, and bradycardia increased significantly at ≥ 1000 µg/mL dose.
CONCLUSION
The side effects of intrathecally administered fentanyl were concentration-dependent, although no neuronal tissue damage, inflammation, or irreversible neurodysfunction were observed even at 5000 µg/mL.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.