MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000111581

Медицинская библиотека · Neuroepidemiology · 2007

A case-control study of the environmental risk factors for narcolepsy.

Picchioni Dante, Hope Chris R, Harsh John R

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Despite the acknowledged importance of environmental risk factors in the etiology of narcolepsy, there is little research on this topic. This study sought to fill this gap in the literature and assess the risk of stressors and infectious diseases using a case-control study.

METHODS

Cases (n = 63) were recruited through the Stanford Center for Narcolepsy. All were HLA-DQB1*0602 positive, met conventional Multiple Sleep Latency Test criteria, and reported unambiguous cataplexy. Controls (n = 63) were nonrelated family members of cases and local community members. A self-administered questionnaire was used to assess the frequency and timing of possible risk factors.

RESULTS

Of the infectious diseases examined, only flu infections and unexplained fevers carried a significant risk. Several of the stressors carried a significant risk including a major change in sleeping habits. When the timing of all risk factors was considered, exposure prior to puberty increased the risk for developing narcolepsy.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings emphasize the importance of environmental risk factors in the etiology of narcolepsy. This highlights the need for further research on this aspect of narcolepsy so a complete understanding of a disorder that affects 1 in 2,000 individuals can emerge.

Для цитирования: Picchioni Dante, Hope Chris R, Harsh John R. A case-control study of the environmental risk factors for narcolepsy.. Neuroepidemiology. 2007. DOI: 10.1159/000111581.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.