A new definition for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: An international expert consensus statement.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАОбзорConsensus StatementНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Eslam Mohammed, Newsome Philip N, Sarin Shiv K, Anstee Quentin M, Targher Giovanni, Romero-Gomez Manuel, Zelber-Sagi Shira, Wai-Sun Wong Vincent, Dufour Jean-François, Schattenberg Jörn M, Kawaguchi Takumi, Arrese Marco, Valenti Luca, Shiha Gamal, Tiribelli Claudio, Yki-Järvinen Hannele, Fan Jian-Gao, Grønbæk Henning, Yilmaz Yusuf, Cortez-Pinto Helena, Oliveira Claudia P, Bedossa Pierre, Adams Leon A, Zheng Ming-Hua, Fouad Yasser, Chan Wah-Kheong, Mendez-Sanchez Nahum, Ahn Sang Hoon, Castera Laurent, Bugianesi Elisabetta, Ratziu Vlad, George Jacob
Аннотация
The exclusion of other chronic liver diseases including "excess" alcohol intake has until now been necessary to establish a diagnosis of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). However, given our current understanding of the pathogenesis of MAFLD and its rising prevalence, "positive criteria" to diagnose the disease are required. In this work, a panel of international experts from 22 countries propose a new definition for the diagnosis of MAFLD that is both comprehensive and simple, and is independent of other liver diseases. The criteria are based on evidence of hepatic steatosis, in addition to one of the following three criteria, namely overweight/obesity, presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus, or evidence of metabolic dysregulation. We propose that disease assessment and stratification of severity should extend beyond a simple dichotomous classification to steatohepatitis vs. non-steatohepatitis. The group also suggests a set of criteria to define MAFLD-associated cirrhosis and proposes a conceptual framework to consider other causes of fatty liver disease. Finally, we bring clarity to the distinction between diagnostic criteria and inclusion criteria for research studies and clinical trials. Reaching consensus on the criteria for MAFLD will help unify the terminology (e.g. for ICD-coding), enhance the legitimacy of clinical practice and clinical trials, improve clinical care and move the clinical and scientific field of liver research forward.