MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.01.042

Медицинская библиотека · The American journal of cardiology · 2020

Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in Patients With Uncommon Etiology Cardiomyopathy.

Galand Vincent, Flécher Erwan, Chabanne Céline, Lelong Bernard, Goéminne Céline, Vincentelli André, Delmas Clément, Dambrin Camille, Picard François, Sacher Frédéric, Kindo Michel, Minh Tam Hoang, Gaudard Philippe, Rouvière Philippe, Sénage Thomas, Michel Magali, Boignard Aude, Chavanon Olivier, Verdonk Constance, Ghodhbane Walid, Pelcé Edeline, Gariboldi Vlad, Pozzi Matteo, Obadia Jean-François, Litzler Pierre-Yvesl, Anselme Frédéric, Babatasi Gerard, Blanchart Katrien, Garnier Fabien, Bielefeld Marie, Hamon David, Lellouche Nicolas, Bourguignon Thierry, Genet Thibaud, Eschalier Romain, D'Ostrevy Nicolas, Varlet Emilie, Jouan Jérôme, Vanhuyse Fabrice, Blangy Hugues, Leclercq Christophe, Martins Raphaël P

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The impact of uncommon etiology cardiomyopathies on Left-ventricular assist device (LVAD)-recipient outcomes is not very well known. This study aimed to characterize patients with uncommon cardiomyopathy etiologies and examine the outcomes between uncommon and ischemic/idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. This observational study was conducted in 19 centers between 2006 and 2016. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of patients with uncommon etiology were compared to patients with idiopathic dilated/ischemic cardiomyopathies. Among 652 LVAD-recipients included, a total of 590 (90.5%) patients were classified as ischemic/idiopathic and 62 (9.5%) patients were classified in the "uncommon etiologies" group. Main uncommon etiologies were: hypertrophic (n = 12(19%)); cancer therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) (n = 12(19%)); myocarditis (n = 11(18%)); valvulopathy (n = 9(15%)) and others (n = 18(29%)). Patients with uncommon etiologies were significantly younger with more female and presented less co-morbidities. Additionally, patients with uncommon cardiomyopathies were less implanted as destination therapy compared with ischemic/idiopathic group (29% vs 38.8%). During a follow-up period of 9.1 months, both groups experienced similar survival. However, subgroup of hypertrophic/valvular cardiomyopathies and CTRCD had significantly higher mortality compared to the ischemic/idiopathic or myocarditis/others cardiomyopathies. Conversely, patients with myocarditis/others etiologies experienced a better survival. Indeed, the 12-months survival in the myocarditis/others; ischemic/idiopathic and hypertrophic/CTRCD/valvulopathy group were 77%; 65%, and 46% respectively. In conclusion, LVAD-recipients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, valvular heart disease and CTRCD experienced the higher mortality rate.

Для цитирования: Galand Vincent, Flécher Erwan, Chabanne Céline, Lelong Bernard, Goéminne Céline, Vincentelli André, Delmas Clément, Dambrin Camille, Picard François, Sacher Frédéric, Kindo Michel, Minh Tam Hoang, Gaudard Philippe, Rouvière Philippe, Sénage Thomas, Michel Magali, Boignard Aude, Chavanon Olivier, Verdonk Constance, Ghodhbane Walid, Pelcé Edeline, Gariboldi Vlad, Pozzi Matteo, Obadia Jean-François, Litzler Pierre-Yvesl, Anselme Frédéric, Babatasi Gerard, Blanchart Katrien, Garnier Fabien, Bielefeld Marie, Hamon David, Lellouche Nicolas, Bourguignon Thierry, Genet Thibaud, Eschalier Romain, D'Ostrevy Nicolas, Varlet Emilie, Jouan Jérôme, Vanhuyse Fabrice, Blangy Hugues, Leclercq Christophe, Martins Raphaël P. Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in Patients With Uncommon Etiology Cardiomyopathy.. The American journal of cardiology. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.01.042.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.