MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s15010-021-01614-9

Медицинская библиотека · Infection · 2021

Self-sampling versus health care professional-guided swab collection for SARS-CoV-2 testing.

Würstle Silvia, Spinner Christoph D, Voit Florian, Hoffmann Dieter, Hering Svenja, Weidlich Simon, Schneider Jochen, Zink Alexander, Treiber Matthias, Iakoubov Roman, Schmid Roland M, Protzer Ulrike, Erber Johanna

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic reliability and practicability of self-collected oropharyngeal swab samples for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection as self-sampling could enable broader testing availability and reduce both personal protective equipment and potential exposure.

METHODS

Hospitalized SARS-CoV-2-infected patients were asked to collect two oropharyngeal swabs (SC-OPS1/2), and an additional oropharyngeal swab was collected by a health care professional (HCP-OPS). SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing for samples from 58 participants was performed, with a 48-h delay in half of the self-collected samples (SC-OPS2). The sensitivity, probability of concordance, and interrater reliability were calculated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess predictive factors. Practicability was evaluated through a questionnaire.

RESULTS

The test sensitivity for HCP-OPS, SC-OPS1, and SC-OPS2 was 88%, 78%, and 77%, respectively. Combining both SC-OPS results increased the estimated sensitivity to 88%. The concordance probability between HCP-OPS and SC-OPS1 was 77.6% and 82.5% between SC-OPS1 and SC-OPS2, respectively. Of the participants, 69% affirmed performing future self-sampling at home, and 34% preferred self-sampling over HCP-guided testing. Participants with both positive HCP-OPS1 and SC-OPS1 indicating no challenges during self-sampling had more differences in viral load levels between HCP-OPS1 and SC-OPS1 than those who indicated challenges. Increasing disease duration and the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2-IgG correlated with negative test results in self-collected samples of previously confirmed SARS-CoV-2 positive individuals.

CONCLUSION

Oropharyngeal self-sampling is an applicable testing approach for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics. Self-sampling tends to be more effective in early versus late infection and symptom onset, and the collection of two distinct samples is recommended to maintain high test sensitivity.

Для цитирования: Würstle Silvia, Spinner Christoph D, Voit Florian, Hoffmann Dieter, Hering Svenja, Weidlich Simon, Schneider Jochen, Zink Alexander, Treiber Matthias, Iakoubov Roman, Schmid Roland M, Protzer Ulrike, Erber Johanna. Self-sampling versus health care professional-guided swab collection for SARS-CoV-2 testing.. Infection. 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s15010-021-01614-9.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.