Gastroenterologia y hepatologia · 2025
Management of refractory ulcerative proctitis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Barreiro-de Acosta Manuel, Mesonero Francisco, Ferreiro-Iglesias Rocío, García-López Santiago, Aguas Peris Mariam, Sierra Ausín Mónica, Cano Sanz Noelia, Valdivia Martínez Antonio, Cábez Ana, Ramírez Susan, Ginard Daniel
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Ulcerative proctitis (UP) usually presents a milder course, but some patients develop significant symptom burden, severe forms, or refractory UP (RUP). Our objective was to characterise RUP and generate recommendations for daily practice.
METHODS: A systematic review (SR) was conducted to analyze epidemiological, clinical, and pharmacological treatment aspects of RUP. The results were discussed in a nominal focus group meeting composed of seven gastroenterologists specialized in the management of inflammatory bowel disease, a nurse, and a patient. Several statements on the management of PU were proposed and voted to achieve agreement.
RESULTS: The SR included 43 articles of low to moderate quality. Nearly 30% of patients presented RUP, and the impact of the disease on their quality of life was highly significant. Different gaps of knowledge related to the clinical characteristics and course of the disease, efficacy, safety, and selection of pharmacological treatments were identified. The experts proposed 13 practical statements that reached the established level of agreement. These address the diagnosis of UP and RUP, their therapeutic goals and treatment selection, monitoring, treatment response, and the role of the nurse.
CONCLUSIONS: RUP is common and can have a significant impact on patients. More research is needed to characterize RUP and the long-term efficacy of available treatments. The proposed statements aim to address the knowledge gaps related to RUP.
METHODS: A systematic review (SR) was conducted to analyze epidemiological, clinical, and pharmacological treatment aspects of RUP. The results were discussed in a nominal focus group meeting composed of seven gastroenterologists specialized in the management of inflammatory bowel disease, a nurse, and a patient. Several statements on the management of PU were proposed and voted to achieve agreement.
RESULTS: The SR included 43 articles of low to moderate quality. Nearly 30% of patients presented RUP, and the impact of the disease on their quality of life was highly significant. Different gaps of knowledge related to the clinical characteristics and course of the disease, efficacy, safety, and selection of pharmacological treatments were identified. The experts proposed 13 practical statements that reached the established level of agreement. These address the diagnosis of UP and RUP, their therapeutic goals and treatment selection, monitoring, treatment response, and the role of the nurse.
CONCLUSIONS: RUP is common and can have a significant impact on patients. More research is needed to characterize RUP and the long-term efficacy of available treatments. The proposed statements aim to address the knowledge gaps related to RUP.