MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.12968/hmed.2022.0113

Медицинская библиотека · British journal of hospital medicine (London, England : 2005) · 2022

Improving delirium screening in older adults at the Royal United Hospital, Bath.

Trew Christopher Aj, Cross Rachael, Howell Kate, Dyer Chris

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIMS/

BACKGROUND

Delirium affects around 20% of older inpatients, increasing mortality and length of stay. Around 30% of cases are preventable. The authors sought to determine compliance of the admissions to the Older People's Unit of the Royal University Hospital Bath with the national and internal guidelines for delirium screening and improve its use on admission.

METHODS

A total of 60 patients' notes were inspected for compliance. Subsequently, the authors implemented teaching, changed the admission proforma and re-wrote the hospital guidelines for delirium. The notes were rescreened at 6 and 18 months.

RESULTS

Initially, 25% of notes met the national standards and 63% met the hospital criteria. At 6 months this was 52% and 82% respectively, and at 18 months it was 41% and 87% respectively. The proportion of patients screened via multiple methods also increased.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a sustained improvement in compliance with the national and hospital standards for delirium screening. There was some degradation in the national standard but the proportion of patients meeting the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence standard was still higher than pre-intervention.

Для цитирования: Trew Christopher Aj, Cross Rachael, Howell Kate, Dyer Chris. Improving delirium screening in older adults at the Royal United Hospital, Bath.. British journal of hospital medicine (London, England : 2005). 2022. DOI: 10.12968/hmed.2022.0113.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.