MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.joms.2005.12.063

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2007

Drug treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review of the literature.

Chole Revant, Patil Ranjitkumar, Degwekar Shirish S, Bhowate Rahul R

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: This study undertook a systematic review of the literature on drug treatment of trigeminal neuralgia.

METHODS

An electronic search was carried out for articles published between January 1960 to February 2005. Studies with high level of evidence were included. The levels of evidence of the articles were classified after the guidelines of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.

RESULTS

Of 770 publications, only 21 publications showed a high level of evidence (6 randomized controlled trials and 15 clinical trials/controlled clinical trials), with a total of 348 patients. A total of 749 publications were not included in the review as they showed a low level of evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Anticonvulsants are effective in treating trigeminal neuralgia; however, few studies with high levels of evidence were found. It is quite difficult to compare or even combine their outcomes in a scientifically meaningful manner. Due to insufficient research data, there is a need for high-quality randomized controlled trials in this area of medicine.

Для цитирования: Chole Revant, Patil Ranjitkumar, Degwekar Shirish S, Bhowate Rahul R. Drug treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review of the literature.. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.12.063.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.