DOI 10.1097/as9.0000000000000552
Prognostic Impact of Diabetes Mellitus and Extended Hepatectomy on Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the prognostic impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) in patients who underwent resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC) and the influence of remnant liver volumes on postoperative glycemic profiles and survival outcomes.
BACKGROUND
The impact of DM and extended hepatectomy on survival outcomes of patients with PHCC remains unclear.
METHODS
A total of 184 patients who underwent hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection for PHCC between 2002 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into groups based on DM and future liver remnant (FLR) ≥40% or <40%. Survival outcomes and glycemic profiles were analyzed.
RESULTS
Patients with DM (n = 34) had significantly worse overall survival compared with those without DM (n = 150; median survival time: 23.3 vs 46.7 months; P = 0.003) although cancer-specific survival was comparable (P = 0.894). Patients with DM had a higher incidence of death from infections (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified DM as an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio, 1.742; P = 0.021). DM with FLR <40% (n = 11) exhibited worse survival (median survival time: 13.7 vs 35.0 months; P = 0.026) and a higher incidence of death from infections (P = 0.016) compared with those with FLR ≥40% (n = 23). The median glucose fluctuation was larger in patients with DM and FLR <40% (80 vs 39 mg/dL; P = 0.023).
CONCLUSIONS
DM was an independent prognostic factor in patients with PHCC undergoing hepatectomy. DM and FLR <40% were associated with worse survival and larger glucose fluctuation postoperatively.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.