Diagnostic value of ultrasound elastography for differentiation of benign and malignant axillary lymph nodes: a meta-analysis.

AIM: To investigate the diagnostic value of ultrasound elastography (UE) for benign and malignant axillary lymph nodes.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A literature search was conducted from PubMed, Cochrane EMBASE, and Medline. Fourteen studies including 1,186 patients with 1,411 lymph nodes were enrolled. Overall, diagnostic descriptive statistics included pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were generated by random effect model. Subgroup analyses were performed in (real-time elastography [RTE] versus shear wave elastography [SWE]) and (conventional ultrasound versus combination of traditional ultrasound and elastography). Meta-regression was used to explore potential sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

The overall pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of UE was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.71-0.86), 0.90 (95% CI: 0.83-0.95), and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88-0.93), respectively. In the subgroup analysis of the two UE techniques, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of SWE was higher than that of RTE (sensitivity: 0.82>0.77; specificity: 0.91>0.89; AUC: 0.94>0.89). The pooled diagnostic value of ultrasound combined with UE were significantly improving compared with traditional ultrasound (sensitivity: 0.87>0.82, specificity: 0.83>0.78, and AUC: 0.91>0.87). No independent heterogeneous factor was found in meta-regression.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that UE was an effective technique for identifying malignant axillary lymph nodes due to its high diagnostic efficiency, which can provide useful information for surgical procedure selection.