MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 1990

Analysis of eight Sipple's syndrome patients and review of eighty-two cases from the Japanese literature.

Oishi S, Sasaki M, Yamauchi J, Umeda T, Sato T

Клинический случайСтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Eight Sipple's syndrome patients from four families have been reviewed. One family had the largest number of members with pheochromocytoma and/or medullary thyroid carcinoma. A total of 82 cases (47 females and 35 males) collected from the Japanese literature during the period 1960-1989, are also reviewed. The ages ranged from 22 to 73 (median 41) years, 13%, being over the age of 60 years (elderly patients). Pheochromocytoma occurred bilaterally in 72% of cases. With Sipple's syndrome, a relatively high urinary excretion of the epinephrine fraction and a high content of epinephrine in the tumor tissues were thought to be characteristic. Seventy-three patients underwent adrenalectomy with a successful outcome for 62 (85%). There needs to be careful periodic follow-up after unilateral adrenalectomy. Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) also occurred bilaterally and was multicentric in 66% of cases, and was often found to be metastasized to the cervical lymph nodes at the time of surgery (35%). Parathyroid disease was found in 22% of cases: parathyroid adenoma in nine, hyperplasia in 10. Fourteen patients (17%) died of surgical complications, hypertensive crisis caused by excessive catecholamine release and/or widespread MTC metastases.

Для цитирования: Oishi S, Sasaki M, Yamauchi J, Umeda T, Sato T. Analysis of eight Sipple's syndrome patients and review of eighty-two cases from the Japanese literature.. Japanese journal of clinical oncology. 1990.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.