MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.radcr.2026.05.066

Медицинская библиотека · Radiology case reports · 2026

Peri-procedural recognition of a calcified cerebral embolus following mechanical thrombectomy: A case report.

Dai Monami, Ogura Takeshi, Ohmori Shigehiro

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Calcified cerebral embolism (CCE), an uncommon but increasingly recognized cause of ischemic stroke, is often associated with technical challenges during mechanical thrombectomy (MT). The case reported here is of an octogenarian woman who presented with acute aphasia and scattered bilateral microinfarcts without large vessel occlusion, followed by recurrent aphasia 1 week later due to acute left internal carotid artery occlusion requiring MT. Despite multiple device passes, only partial reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2a) was achieved, and post-procedural computed tomography revealed a newly appeared, well-circumscribed, hyperdense lesion consistent with a calcified cerebral embolus that had not been detected on prior imaging. This case highlights the importance of recognizing CCE as a potential cause of incomplete reperfusion and procedural difficulty during MT, as well as the diagnostic value of thin-section computed tomography for detecting calcified emboli. Increased awareness of CCE may facilitate a more accurate diagnosis, guide procedural strategies, and improve etiological evaluation in embolic stroke.

Для цитирования: Dai Monami, Ogura Takeshi, Ohmori Shigehiro. Peri-procedural recognition of a calcified cerebral embolus following mechanical thrombectomy: A case report.. Radiology case reports. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2026.05.066.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.