International endodontic journal · 2001
Detection of Slackia exigua, Mogibacterium timidum and Eubacterium saphenum from pulpal and periradicular samples using the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) method.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hashimura T, Sato M, Hoshino E
Аннотация
AIM: The purpose of this study was to detect Slackia exigua from root canal samples using a sensitive PCR amplification method. Mogibacterium timidum and Eubacterium saphenum were also included because of their culture-difficult properties.
METHODOLOGY: The species-specific PCR primers were prepared according to 16S rDNA sequence analysis data, and confirmed to be effective for PCR amplification as species-specific, respectively. A total of 36 clinical samples were obtained during the first visit of root canal treatment.
RESULTS: The sensitivity of detection was a minimum of 10 organisms for S. exigua and five organisms for M. timidum and E. saphenum, respectively. In seven cases of pulpitis, Sexigua was detected in two cases (29%), and M. timidum in two cases (29%), but E. saphenum was not detected. In 17 cases of root canal treatment, S. exigua was detected in seven cases (41%), M. timidum in 12 cases (71%) and E. saphenum in four cases (24%). In 12 cases of root canal retreatment, S. exigua was detected in three cases (25%), M. timidum in three cases (25%) and E. saphenum in two cases (17%).
CONCLUSIONS: S. exigua, M. timidum and E. saphenum were present in root canal systems, and may be associated with pulpal and periradicular pathosis.
METHODOLOGY: The species-specific PCR primers were prepared according to 16S rDNA sequence analysis data, and confirmed to be effective for PCR amplification as species-specific, respectively. A total of 36 clinical samples were obtained during the first visit of root canal treatment.
RESULTS: The sensitivity of detection was a minimum of 10 organisms for S. exigua and five organisms for M. timidum and E. saphenum, respectively. In seven cases of pulpitis, Sexigua was detected in two cases (29%), and M. timidum in two cases (29%), but E. saphenum was not detected. In 17 cases of root canal treatment, S. exigua was detected in seven cases (41%), M. timidum in 12 cases (71%) and E. saphenum in four cases (24%). In 12 cases of root canal retreatment, S. exigua was detected in three cases (25%), M. timidum in three cases (25%) and E. saphenum in two cases (17%).
CONCLUSIONS: S. exigua, M. timidum and E. saphenum were present in root canal systems, and may be associated with pulpal and periradicular pathosis.