Lasers in surgery and medicine · 1998
Clinical preconditions and treatment modality: effects on pulp surgery outcome.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dang J, Wilder-Smith P, Peavy G M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this research was to evaluate the factors affecting the outcome of localized laser pulp surgery in the canine model.
STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pulpal exposures 2 mm and 5 mm in diameter were prepared in eight healthy teeth in each of five dogs. The total of 40 teeth were left open to infection from the oral cavity for 3 hours or 72 hours; 2-3 mm of surface pulpal tissue were then removed using a fresh diamond bur or a CO2 laser emitting@9.3 microns, at 3.5 W average power in the Superpulse mode. Teeth were monitored clinically and radiographically by one blinded, pre-standardized clinician for 3 months.
RESULTS: Chi-square test and Fisher's Exact test (2-tail) results associated laser treatment with significantly better clinical and radiographic outcome (P < 0.001). Using regression analysis, duration of pulpal exposure to contamination by the oral environment was identified as primary determinant for treatment outcome within the laser-treated and control groups (P = 0.0018).
CONCLUSION: Clinical preconditions significantly affect the outcome of pulp surgery treatments.
STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pulpal exposures 2 mm and 5 mm in diameter were prepared in eight healthy teeth in each of five dogs. The total of 40 teeth were left open to infection from the oral cavity for 3 hours or 72 hours; 2-3 mm of surface pulpal tissue were then removed using a fresh diamond bur or a CO2 laser emitting@9.3 microns, at 3.5 W average power in the Superpulse mode. Teeth were monitored clinically and radiographically by one blinded, pre-standardized clinician for 3 months.
RESULTS: Chi-square test and Fisher's Exact test (2-tail) results associated laser treatment with significantly better clinical and radiographic outcome (P < 0.001). Using regression analysis, duration of pulpal exposure to contamination by the oral environment was identified as primary determinant for treatment outcome within the laser-treated and control groups (P = 0.0018).
CONCLUSION: Clinical preconditions significantly affect the outcome of pulp surgery treatments.