Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics · 1996
Examination of external apical root resorption with scanning electron microscopy.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Malueg L A, Wilcox L R, Johnson W
Аннотация
UNLABELLED: External apical root resorption may be evident histologically but not visible radiographically until it is advanced. If working length is determined without considering this resorption, overinstrumentation or overfilling may occur.
OBJECTIVE: This study used scanning electron microscopy to examine the appearance and to compare the incidence of external apical root resorption in 40 teeth with differing pulpal and periapical diagnoses.
STUDY DESIGN: After extraction, 46 roots were sectioned horizontally 6 mm from the anatomic apex and prepared for scanning electron microscopy examination. Photomicrographs were scored by two blinded independent examiners. Apical resorption was categorized as: none, partial, or complete. Presence or absence of a funneling appearance of the resorption was also recorded.
RESULTS: Kruskal Wallis showed a significant difference in resorption between groups; teeth with irreversible pulpitis/normal periapex had the least resorption. Duncan's multiple range test found radiographic apical lesions to have more resorption than those without lesions; teeth with necrotic pulps had more resorption than those with vital pulps.
CONCLUSION: Pulp necrosis with radiolucent apical pathosis is more likely to demonstrate resorption.
OBJECTIVE: This study used scanning electron microscopy to examine the appearance and to compare the incidence of external apical root resorption in 40 teeth with differing pulpal and periapical diagnoses.
STUDY DESIGN: After extraction, 46 roots were sectioned horizontally 6 mm from the anatomic apex and prepared for scanning electron microscopy examination. Photomicrographs were scored by two blinded independent examiners. Apical resorption was categorized as: none, partial, or complete. Presence or absence of a funneling appearance of the resorption was also recorded.
RESULTS: Kruskal Wallis showed a significant difference in resorption between groups; teeth with irreversible pulpitis/normal periapex had the least resorption. Duncan's multiple range test found radiographic apical lesions to have more resorption than those without lesions; teeth with necrotic pulps had more resorption than those with vital pulps.
CONCLUSION: Pulp necrosis with radiolucent apical pathosis is more likely to demonstrate resorption.