DOI 10.1097/pai.0b013e3181ca8fbd
Immunophenotypic evaluation of DNA mismatch repair markers in 2 cases of synchronous histomorphologically distinct gastric adenocarcinomas with gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the proximal small bowel.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
To assess the prognostic value of combined mismatch DNA repair (MMR) phenotyping in 2 synchronous histomorphologically distinct gastric adenocarcinomas (GADCs), each accompanied by gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) of the proximal small bowel.
SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: A 72-year-old female and a 55-year-old male patient were submitted to partial and total gastrectomy, respectively, with synchronous resection of a GIST in the proximal small bowel. The 2 patients attained contrasting survival outcomes. The female survives disease-free 20 months after surgery having received no chemotherapy. The male who received adjuvant chemotherapy developed metastases in liver and lung, and died 18 months after surgery.
METHODS
We phenotype MSH2 and MLH1 protein expression in tumor relative to matched normal tissue by immunohistochemistry.
RESULTS
Immunohistochemistry analysis revealed different combined MMR phenotypes for the 2 histomorhologically distinct GADCs and similar for both GISTs studied.
CONCLUSIONS
Good and bad prognosis for disease-free survival of patients based on reduced and elevated combined MMR phenotypic expression of the 2 histomorphologically distinct GADCs, could be explained by disease-associated emergence of genomic MMR alterations in the tumor. The impact of synchronous GISTs with common intermediate MMR phenotypes on patient survival is rather incidental and secondary to predominating GADCs.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.