Clinical cardiology · 2008
Systolic function as a predictor of mortality and quality of life in long-term survivors with heart failure.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Austin Bethany A, Wang Yongfei, Smith Grace L, Vaccarine Viola, Krumholz Harlan M, McNamara Robert L
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure (HF) and preserved ejection fraction (EF) have been shown to have high mortality rates, comparable to those with reduced EF. Thus, long-term survivors of HF, regardless of ejection fraction, are a select group. Little is known about disease-related quality of life (QOL) and health status in these patients.
HYPOTHESIS: Preserved EF in patients with heart failure independently predicts long-term survival, health related quality of life (QOL), or functional status.
METHODS: The study followed a cohort of 413 patients consecutively hospitalized for HF between March 1996 and September 1998. In July 2005, information was collected about their mortality, health related QOL as defined by disease-specific Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) scores, and functional decline as defined by limitations in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scores.
RESULTS: The primary outcomes were mortality, QOL, and functional decline. At follow-up, 8.1 years after enrollment, overall mortality was 76% (314/413). Adjusted for age, gender, renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, HF, and respiratory disease, those with decreased ejection fraction (EF < 40%) had higher mortality compared with those with preserved ejection fraction (hazard ratio [HR] 1.42; confidence interval [CI] = 1.13, 1.80, p = 0.003). The KCCQ scores, including Clinical Summary Scores and Symptom Limitation Scores, as well as ADL limitations, were not significantly different in the survivors with preserved or decreased EF.
CONCLUSIONS: Heart failure patients with preserved EF have a modest survival advantage compared with those with decreased EF, but health related QOL scores and functional decline in survivors are similar regardless of systolic function.
HYPOTHESIS: Preserved EF in patients with heart failure independently predicts long-term survival, health related quality of life (QOL), or functional status.
METHODS: The study followed a cohort of 413 patients consecutively hospitalized for HF between March 1996 and September 1998. In July 2005, information was collected about their mortality, health related QOL as defined by disease-specific Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) scores, and functional decline as defined by limitations in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scores.
RESULTS: The primary outcomes were mortality, QOL, and functional decline. At follow-up, 8.1 years after enrollment, overall mortality was 76% (314/413). Adjusted for age, gender, renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, HF, and respiratory disease, those with decreased ejection fraction (EF < 40%) had higher mortality compared with those with preserved ejection fraction (hazard ratio [HR] 1.42; confidence interval [CI] = 1.13, 1.80, p = 0.003). The KCCQ scores, including Clinical Summary Scores and Symptom Limitation Scores, as well as ADL limitations, were not significantly different in the survivors with preserved or decreased EF.
CONCLUSIONS: Heart failure patients with preserved EF have a modest survival advantage compared with those with decreased EF, but health related QOL scores and functional decline in survivors are similar regardless of systolic function.