Critical reviews in oncology/hematology · 2025
KRAS G12C inhibitors as monotherapy or in combination for metastatic colorectal cancer: A proportion and comparative meta-analysis of efficacy and toxicity from phase I-II-III trials.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Akkus Erman, Öksüz Nejat Emre, Erul Enes
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: 1-2 % of metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRC) harbor an activating KRAS-G12C mutation. This study aims to pool the results of available clinical trials of KRAS-G12C inhibitors, comparing monotherapy and combinations.
METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in the MEDLINE database and ESMO/ASCO meeting abstracts. Phase I-II-III trials that investigated a KRAS-G12C inhibitor in patients with mCRC were included. The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Pooled proportions and comparative subgroup analyses for monotherapy and combinations were presented with the random effects model.
RESULTS: 596 patients with previously treated mCRC in 14 study cohorts treated with one of sotorasib, adagrasib, divarasib, or olomorasib as monotherapy or in combination with cetuximab/panitumumab were included. Combination treatment revealed an ORR of 33.9 % (95 %CI: 20.7-48.4) (I2: 87.1), which is significantly higher than monotherapy [16.7 %, (95 %CI: 8.3-27.3) (I2: 73.2)] (p = 0.045). Median PFS was significantly longer with the combination [5.7 months (95 %CI: 4.4-7.1) (I2: 80.8) vs. 4.2 months (95 %CI: 3.6-4.7) (I2:0.0), p = 0.027]. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were significantly more frequent with the combination [32.8 % (95 %CI: 26.4-39.6) (I2:42.5) vs.16.5 % (95 %CI: 4.9-33.1) (I2: 84.2), p = 0.047]. Common adverse events specific to the combinations were skin toxicities, paronychia, and hypomagnesemia.
CONCLUSION: This analysis suggests that KRAS-G12C inhibitors in combination with anti-EGFR agents may provide a doubled ORR and 1.5-month PFS benefit compared to monotherapy in previously treated mCRC patients, but with a doubled grade 3-4 TRAEs, including skin toxicities, paronychia, and hypomagnesemia. Treatment preferences should be individualized in these highly pretreated patients.
METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in the MEDLINE database and ESMO/ASCO meeting abstracts. Phase I-II-III trials that investigated a KRAS-G12C inhibitor in patients with mCRC were included. The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Pooled proportions and comparative subgroup analyses for monotherapy and combinations were presented with the random effects model.
RESULTS: 596 patients with previously treated mCRC in 14 study cohorts treated with one of sotorasib, adagrasib, divarasib, or olomorasib as monotherapy or in combination with cetuximab/panitumumab were included. Combination treatment revealed an ORR of 33.9 % (95 %CI: 20.7-48.4) (I2: 87.1), which is significantly higher than monotherapy [16.7 %, (95 %CI: 8.3-27.3) (I2: 73.2)] (p = 0.045). Median PFS was significantly longer with the combination [5.7 months (95 %CI: 4.4-7.1) (I2: 80.8) vs. 4.2 months (95 %CI: 3.6-4.7) (I2:0.0), p = 0.027]. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were significantly more frequent with the combination [32.8 % (95 %CI: 26.4-39.6) (I2:42.5) vs.16.5 % (95 %CI: 4.9-33.1) (I2: 84.2), p = 0.047]. Common adverse events specific to the combinations were skin toxicities, paronychia, and hypomagnesemia.
CONCLUSION: This analysis suggests that KRAS-G12C inhibitors in combination with anti-EGFR agents may provide a doubled ORR and 1.5-month PFS benefit compared to monotherapy in previously treated mCRC patients, but with a doubled grade 3-4 TRAEs, including skin toxicities, paronychia, and hypomagnesemia. Treatment preferences should be individualized in these highly pretreated patients.