Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
Digital Skin Cancer Risk Reduction Interventions for Young Adults: Findings from a Hybrid Type-II Effectiveness-Implementation Trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Heckman Carolyn J, Handorf Elizabeth A, Mitarotondo Anna, Khavjou Olga, Manne Sharon L, Yaroch Amy L, Glanz Karen
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Engagement in sun protection behaviors is low among young adults (ages 18-25 years). Efficacious sun safety interventions for this at-risk population and information on intervention engagement and costs are needed. The purpose was to conduct secondary analyses examining intervention implementation strategies and outcomes (e.g., engagement), intervention moderators, and costs of three digital interventions to increase sun protection behaviors previously evaluated for effectiveness in a randomized controlled trial.
METHODS: The randomized controlled trial compared three conditions: a basic efficacious intervention, an enhanced version of the intervention, and an educational e-pamphlet. Sun protection measures, intervention engagement and implementation, putative moderators, and intervention costs were assessed through 1 year.
RESULTS: Engagement (4.6 of 12 modules completed) was similar for basic and enhanced interventions. Engagement was significantly associated with sun protection. Men and individuals with lower tanning ability completed more modules than women and those with higher tanning ability. Enhanced was more effective than basic for men (but not women) through 1 year. After initial development, both active interventions were similar in cost per person at larger sample sizes.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite attempts at enhancement, engagement in basic and enhanced was similar. Although all interventions were costly to create, they were less costly to maintain and could be scaled up for dissemination. Based on both engagement and effects on sun protection, the enhanced intervention would be recommended for men, women, or both.
IMPACT: This digital intervention offers the potential to reduce skin cancer risk in a large population of US young adults.
METHODS: The randomized controlled trial compared three conditions: a basic efficacious intervention, an enhanced version of the intervention, and an educational e-pamphlet. Sun protection measures, intervention engagement and implementation, putative moderators, and intervention costs were assessed through 1 year.
RESULTS: Engagement (4.6 of 12 modules completed) was similar for basic and enhanced interventions. Engagement was significantly associated with sun protection. Men and individuals with lower tanning ability completed more modules than women and those with higher tanning ability. Enhanced was more effective than basic for men (but not women) through 1 year. After initial development, both active interventions were similar in cost per person at larger sample sizes.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite attempts at enhancement, engagement in basic and enhanced was similar. Although all interventions were costly to create, they were less costly to maintain and could be scaled up for dissemination. Based on both engagement and effects on sun protection, the enhanced intervention would be recommended for men, women, or both.
IMPACT: This digital intervention offers the potential to reduce skin cancer risk in a large population of US young adults.