Expert review of cardiovascular therapy · 2025
Surgical pulmonary valve redo versus transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement for Tetralogy of Fallot patients.
СтатьяСистематический обзорСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Penteris Michail, Lampropoulos Konstantinos
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To perform a systematic review to compare the efficacy and safety of transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TPVR) and surgical pulmonary valve replacement (SPVR) in managing pulmonary valve dysfunction in Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) patients.
METHODS: This review investigates through three different databases for randomized control trials or observational studies evaluating TOF patients who underwent TPVR or SPVR until November 2024. The outcomes of interest were hemodynamic improvement, reduction in pulmonary regurgitation or stenosis, complications, quality of life, and long-term outcomes.
RESULTS: Four retrospective studies (1919 procedures) were analyzed. TPVR was non-inferior to SPVR, with a comparable safety profile. The durability of bioprosthetic valves was similar between TPVR and SPVR (HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.55-1.73; p = 0.93) and was influenced by patients' age at PVR (HR: 0.78 per 10 years from <1 year; 95% CI: 0.63-0.96; p = 0.02) and true inner valve diameter .
CONCLUSIONS: TPVR is a safe and less-invasive alternative to SPVR with comparable efficacy in reducing pulmonary regurgitation. Complication rates are similar and valve durability is primarily age- and valve size-dependent. Although further research on long term outcomes is needed, TPVR may be integrated into routine practices, offering a viable alternative for high-risk TOF patients.
REGISTRATION: This systematic review was registered on the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO; #CRD42024615871).
METHODS: This review investigates through three different databases for randomized control trials or observational studies evaluating TOF patients who underwent TPVR or SPVR until November 2024. The outcomes of interest were hemodynamic improvement, reduction in pulmonary regurgitation or stenosis, complications, quality of life, and long-term outcomes.
RESULTS: Four retrospective studies (1919 procedures) were analyzed. TPVR was non-inferior to SPVR, with a comparable safety profile. The durability of bioprosthetic valves was similar between TPVR and SPVR (HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.55-1.73; p = 0.93) and was influenced by patients' age at PVR (HR: 0.78 per 10 years from <1 year; 95% CI: 0.63-0.96; p = 0.02) and true inner valve diameter .
CONCLUSIONS: TPVR is a safe and less-invasive alternative to SPVR with comparable efficacy in reducing pulmonary regurgitation. Complication rates are similar and valve durability is primarily age- and valve size-dependent. Although further research on long term outcomes is needed, TPVR may be integrated into routine practices, offering a viable alternative for high-risk TOF patients.
REGISTRATION: This systematic review was registered on the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO; #CRD42024615871).
Предметные рубрики MeSH
HumansTetralogy of FallotPulmonary ValveHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationPulmonary Valve InsufficiencyQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBioprosthesisHeart Valve ProsthesisRetrospective StudiesCardiac CatheterizationPulmonary Valve StenosisReoperationTreatment OutcomeObservational Studies as Topic