Future science OA · 2025
Comparative analysis of JCI and nationally accredited medical organizations with day surgical hospital.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kudabayev Kaisar, Ismailova Aigul, Dzhusupov Kenesh, Suleimenova Roza, Mussina Aiman, Mustafinova Gulnar, Yeleussizova Bakhyt, Smagulov Nurlan
Аннотация
AIMS: This study aimed to assess healthcare professionals' attitudes toward accreditation and compare perceptions between staff working in Joint Commission International (JCI)-accredited and nationally accredited medical institutions in Astana, Kazakhstan.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey conducted among health professionals at a JCI-accredited hospital and two nationally accredited city polyclinics. The questionnaire comprised 38 items assessing employee satisfaction, teamwork cohesion, and perceived service quality.
RESULTS: A total of 191 healthcare workers participated in the study with a response rate of more than 95%. Overall, 54.4% of respondents reported positive attitudes toward JCI accreditation, and 4.1% expressed very positive views. Perceptions of JCI's impact on patient safety were more favorable, with 63.3% rating it positively. Respondents with more than five years of work experience expressed satisfaction that JCI accreditation enhanced patient safety. In addition, participants with postgraduate education (β = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.53-0.65; p < .001) and younger than 34 years (β = 0.555, 95% CI: 0.35-0.76; p < .001) were likely to recommend JCI accreditation.
CONCLUSION: Healthcare professionals perceive JCI accreditation as a positive driver of patient safety, teamwork, and institutional quality culture. Implementing JCI measures may improve patient outcomes, strengthen staff engagement, and facilitate alignment with international standards.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey conducted among health professionals at a JCI-accredited hospital and two nationally accredited city polyclinics. The questionnaire comprised 38 items assessing employee satisfaction, teamwork cohesion, and perceived service quality.
RESULTS: A total of 191 healthcare workers participated in the study with a response rate of more than 95%. Overall, 54.4% of respondents reported positive attitudes toward JCI accreditation, and 4.1% expressed very positive views. Perceptions of JCI's impact on patient safety were more favorable, with 63.3% rating it positively. Respondents with more than five years of work experience expressed satisfaction that JCI accreditation enhanced patient safety. In addition, participants with postgraduate education (β = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.53-0.65; p < .001) and younger than 34 years (β = 0.555, 95% CI: 0.35-0.76; p < .001) were likely to recommend JCI accreditation.
CONCLUSION: Healthcare professionals perceive JCI accreditation as a positive driver of patient safety, teamwork, and institutional quality culture. Implementing JCI measures may improve patient outcomes, strengthen staff engagement, and facilitate alignment with international standards.