Microbial drug resistance (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2016
Two Clusters of Fluoroquinolone and Clindamycin-Resistant Clostridium difficile PCR Ribotype 001 Strain Recognized by Capillary Electrophoresis Ribotyping and Multilocus Variable Tandem Repeat Analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nyc Otakar, Tejkalova Renata, Kriz Zdenek, Ruzicka Filip, Kubicek Lubos, Matejkova Jana, Kuijper Ed, Krutova Marcela
Аннотация
AIM: To perform a retrospective analysis of the high occurrence of Clostridium difficile infection in the surgical department of a Czech tertiary care hospital and to identify weaknesses in C. difficile infection (CDI) prevention and control policies.
METHODS: Clinical and epidemiological data on eleven CDI cases were collected. C. difficile isolates were characterized by capillary electrophoresis ribotyping, multilocus variable tandem repeat analysis (MLVA), gyrA gene fragment sequencing, and erm(B) fragment PCR amplification. Antibiotic susceptibility to metronidazole, vancomycin, ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and clindamycin was tested.
FINDINGS: Eleven CDI cases were caused by C. difficile PCR ribotype 001 strains. These strains revealed two different MLVA profiles with 11 tandem repeat differences. All isolates were susceptible to metronidazole and vancomycin and resistant to ciprofloxacin (MIC ≥32 mg/L), moxifloxacin (MIC ≥32 mg/L), and clindamycin (MIC ≥256 mg/L). All isolates revealed amino acid substitution Thr82Ile, in the GyrA and were erm(B) negative.
CONCLUSION: Two fluoroquinolone and clindamycin-resistant C. difficile PCR ribotype 001 strain clusters occurred at one of the surgical departments of a tertiary care hospital. Ineffective decontamination with suboptimal concentration and time of exposure of sporicidal disinfectants may have resulted in C. difficile transmission.
METHODS: Clinical and epidemiological data on eleven CDI cases were collected. C. difficile isolates were characterized by capillary electrophoresis ribotyping, multilocus variable tandem repeat analysis (MLVA), gyrA gene fragment sequencing, and erm(B) fragment PCR amplification. Antibiotic susceptibility to metronidazole, vancomycin, ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and clindamycin was tested.
FINDINGS: Eleven CDI cases were caused by C. difficile PCR ribotype 001 strains. These strains revealed two different MLVA profiles with 11 tandem repeat differences. All isolates were susceptible to metronidazole and vancomycin and resistant to ciprofloxacin (MIC ≥32 mg/L), moxifloxacin (MIC ≥32 mg/L), and clindamycin (MIC ≥256 mg/L). All isolates revealed amino acid substitution Thr82Ile, in the GyrA and were erm(B) negative.
CONCLUSION: Two fluoroquinolone and clindamycin-resistant C. difficile PCR ribotype 001 strain clusters occurred at one of the surgical departments of a tertiary care hospital. Ineffective decontamination with suboptimal concentration and time of exposure of sporicidal disinfectants may have resulted in C. difficile transmission.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedAmino Acid SubstitutionAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinClindamycinClostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsCzech RepublicDNA GyraseDNA, BacterialDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialElectrophoresis, CapillaryFemaleFluoroquinolonesGene ExpressionHumansMaleMethyltransferasesMetronidazoleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMinisatellite RepeatsMoxifloxacinMultilocus Sequence TypingRetrospective StudiesRibotypingTertiary Care CentersVancomycin