DOI 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2016.02.007
Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy using diode laser activated indocyanine green as an adjunct in the treatment of chronic periodontitis: A randomized clinical trial.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
Clinical studies have shown the usefulness of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) as an adjunctive in periodontal therapy. These studies did not utilize indocyanine green (ICG) as a recently introduced photosensitizer. The aim of this study was to perform a full-mouth double-blind randomized controlled clinical study to test the efficacy of adjunctive aPDT with ICG compared with scaling and root planing (SRP) alone in chronic periodontitis treatment.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
Fifty patients were selected for this study. All patients received SRP. Then, each patient was randomly assigned to either the test group (aPDT+SRP) or the control group (SRP). aPDT was performed with a diode laser (wavelength: 810nm, power: 200mW) and ICG as photosensitizer. The adjunctive procedure was repeated after 7, 17 and 27 days. The clinical parameters including bleeding on probing (BOP), clinical attachment loss (CAL), plaque index (PI), probing pocket depth (PPD), full mouth plaque score (FMPS) and full mouth bleeding score (FMBS) were measured at baseline and after 1 and 3 months.
RESULTS
There were no significant differences between two groups at baseline. BOP, PPD and FMBS showed significant improvements in the test group (P≤0.001). In terms of PI, FMPS and CAL, no significant differences were observed between both groups (P≥0.05).
CONCLUSION
aPDT as an adjunctive approach yielded complete resolution of inflammation and significant reduction in periodontal pocket depth. However, aPDT had no additional advantages in clinical attachment gain and plaque score.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.