MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000523691

Медицинская библиотека · Urologia internationalis · 2022

Serum Vitamin D Level and Erectile Dysfunction in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Liu Guodong, Wu Xu, Zhang Yuyang, Zhang Wei, Jiang Hui, Dai Yutian, Zhang Xiansheng

МетаанализСистематический обзорСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

A few studies involved the relationship between vitamin D and diabetes mellitus (DM) with erectile dysfunction (ED), and no meta-analysis was conducted to pool these data. The main purpose of our study was to examine the changes in serum vitamin D levels in patients with DM combined with ED.

METHODS

An extensive search was performed, including the following words: "erectile dysfunction," "diabetes," and "vitamin D." Databases, including Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science, were retrieved to identify studies published up to September 30, 2021. Four studies were eligible for our meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The weighted mean difference and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated to the data we selected. The results showed that the level of vitamin D in DM with ED was significantly lower (12.5 nmol/mL) than patients with diabetes alone (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Our novel meta-analysis suggests that vitamin D may be a risk factor for DM with ED, which can provide a new idea for the treatment and prevention of DM with ED.

Для цитирования: Liu Guodong, Wu Xu, Zhang Yuyang, Zhang Wei, Jiang Hui, Dai Yutian, Zhang Xiansheng. Serum Vitamin D Level and Erectile Dysfunction in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.. Urologia internationalis. 2022. DOI: 10.1159/000523691.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.