MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000500666

Медицинская библиотека · Acta haematologica · 2019

Outcomes for Relapsed and Refractory Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma Patients after Front-Line Therapy from the COMPLETE Registry.

Lansigan Frederick, Horwitz Steven M, Pinter-Brown Lauren C, Rosen Steven T, Pro Barbara, Hsi Eric D, Federico Massimo, Gisselbrecht Christian, Schwartz Marc, Bellm Lisa A, Acosta Mark, Shustov Andrei R, Advani Ranjana H, Feldman Tatyana, Lechowicz Mary Jo, Smith Sonali M, Tulpule Anil, Craig Michael D, Greer John P, Kahl Brad S, Leach Joseph W, Morganstein Neil, Casulo Carla, Park Steven I, Foss Francine M

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Outcomes for patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) who fail to achieve complete response (CR) or relapse after front-line therapy are poor with lack of prospective outcomes data.

OBJECTIVES

COMPLETE is a prospective registry of 499 patients enrolled at academic and community sites in the United States detailing patient demographics, treatment and outcomes for patients with aggressive T cell lymphomas. We report results for patients with primary refractory and relapsed disease.

METHODS

Primary refractory disease was defined as an evaluable best response to initial treatment (induction ± maintenance or consolidation/transplant) other than CR, and included a partial response, progressive disease, or no response/stable disease. Relapsed disease was defined as an evaluable best response to initial treatment of CR, followed by disease progression at a later date, irrespective of time to progression. Patients were included in the analysis if initial treatment began within 30 days of enrollment and treatment duration was ≥4 days.

RESULTS

Of 420 evaluable patients, 97 met the definition for primary refractory and 58 with relapsed disease. In the second-line setting, relapsed patients received single-agent therapies more often than refractory patients (52 vs. 28%; p = 0.01) and were more likely to receive single-agent regimens (74 vs. 53%; p = 0.03). The objective response rate to second-line therapy was higher in relapsed patients (61 vs. 40%; p = 0.04) as was the proportion achieving a CR (41 vs. 14%; p = 0.002). Further, relapsed patients had longer overall survival (OS) compared to refractory patients, with a median OS of 29.1 versus 12.3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the availability of newer active single agents, refractory patients were less likely to receive these therapies and continue to have inferior outcomes compared to those with relapsed disease. PTCL in the real world remains an unmet medical need, and improvements in front-line therapies are needed.

Для цитирования: Lansigan Frederick, Horwitz Steven M, Pinter-Brown Lauren C, Rosen Steven T, Pro Barbara, Hsi Eric D, Federico Massimo, Gisselbrecht Christian, Schwartz Marc, Bellm Lisa A, Acosta Mark, Shustov Andrei R, Advani Ranjana H, Feldman Tatyana, Lechowicz Mary Jo, Smith Sonali M, Tulpule Anil, Craig Michael D, Greer John P, Kahl Brad S, Leach Joseph W, Morganstein Neil, Casulo Carla, Park Steven I, Foss Francine M. Outcomes for Relapsed and Refractory Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma Patients after Front-Line Therapy from the COMPLETE Registry.. Acta haematologica. 2019. DOI: 10.1159/000500666.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.