Journal of electrocardiology · 2022
Non-invasive localization of premature ventricular focus: A prospective multicenter study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chrispin Jonathan, Mazur Alexander, Winterfield Jeffrey, Nazeri Alireza, Valderrabano Miguel, Tandri Harikrishna
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Accurate localization of premature ventricular contractions (PVC) focus is a prerequisite to successful catheter ablation.
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the software View Into Ventricular Onset (VIVO) accuracy at locating the anatomical origins for premature ventricular contractions. The VIVO device noninvasively creates a model of the patient's heart and torso, with exact locations of 12‑lead ECG electrodes, and applies a mathematical algorithm from surface signals to determine the origin of the arrhythmia. We sought to compare the agreement between VIVO-predicted locations to invasive electroanatomical mapping results.
METHODS: 51 consecutive patients who presented for PVC ablations at the study centers were recruited. VIVO images were collected at baseline preprocedure and all patients underwent invasive electroanatomical activation mapping of the clinical arrhythmia. Pacing was performed in pre-specified locations in the right and/or left ventricle. The successful sites of ablation and the pacing locations were compared to VIVO predicted locations. The results were adjudicated by physician experts in a blinded fashion.
RESULTS: Seven patients were excluded from analyses. VIVO accurately identified the origin of the clinical premature ventricular contractions in 44/44 patients (100.00%). The accuracy in identifying the paced location for all patients (right and left sides of the heart) was 99.5% using the VIVO system. No adverse events were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: VIVO is a novel noninvasive system that could be used to help guide ablation procedures with a high degree of accuracy. The VIVO algorithm is easy to use and may be useful in the workflow for ventricular arrhythmia ablation.
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the software View Into Ventricular Onset (VIVO) accuracy at locating the anatomical origins for premature ventricular contractions. The VIVO device noninvasively creates a model of the patient's heart and torso, with exact locations of 12‑lead ECG electrodes, and applies a mathematical algorithm from surface signals to determine the origin of the arrhythmia. We sought to compare the agreement between VIVO-predicted locations to invasive electroanatomical mapping results.
METHODS: 51 consecutive patients who presented for PVC ablations at the study centers were recruited. VIVO images were collected at baseline preprocedure and all patients underwent invasive electroanatomical activation mapping of the clinical arrhythmia. Pacing was performed in pre-specified locations in the right and/or left ventricle. The successful sites of ablation and the pacing locations were compared to VIVO predicted locations. The results were adjudicated by physician experts in a blinded fashion.
RESULTS: Seven patients were excluded from analyses. VIVO accurately identified the origin of the clinical premature ventricular contractions in 44/44 patients (100.00%). The accuracy in identifying the paced location for all patients (right and left sides of the heart) was 99.5% using the VIVO system. No adverse events were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: VIVO is a novel noninvasive system that could be used to help guide ablation procedures with a high degree of accuracy. The VIVO algorithm is easy to use and may be useful in the workflow for ventricular arrhythmia ablation.