Medicine · 2022
Comparison of total intravenous anesthesia and inhalation anesthesia on postoperative quality of recovery after laparoscopic hysterectomy: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
He Menglin, Chen Mingxue, Yu Feng
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Postoperative recovery is a complex process and affected mainly by factors from patients, surgery and anesthesia. Although we have all kinds of sedatives and hypnotics now, the selection of an ideal medication for general anesthesia is still challenging. In this study, we perform a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effect of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia and sevoflurane-based inhalation anesthesia on postoperative quality of recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy.
METHODS: The protocol of this review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022379485). Meanwhile, it will be reported follow the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol. We will search 3 foreign electronic databases (Cochrane Library, Embase, Pubmed) and 4 Chinese electronic databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WangFang Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database and Chinese Scientific Journal Database) to collect potential studies from their inceptions to December 2022. Only randomized controlled trials will be included. Two reviewers will independently perform study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Data synthesis and statistical analysis will be performed using the RevMan 5.4 (The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark) software.
RESULTS: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will be publicly available and published in a peer-reviewed journal.
CONCLUSION: This study may provide the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of total intravenous anesthesia and inhalation anesthesia on postoperative quality of recovery after laparoscopic hysterectomy.
METHODS: The protocol of this review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022379485). Meanwhile, it will be reported follow the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol. We will search 3 foreign electronic databases (Cochrane Library, Embase, Pubmed) and 4 Chinese electronic databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WangFang Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database and Chinese Scientific Journal Database) to collect potential studies from their inceptions to December 2022. Only randomized controlled trials will be included. Two reviewers will independently perform study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Data synthesis and statistical analysis will be performed using the RevMan 5.4 (The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark) software.
RESULTS: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will be publicly available and published in a peer-reviewed journal.
CONCLUSION: This study may provide the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of total intravenous anesthesia and inhalation anesthesia on postoperative quality of recovery after laparoscopic hysterectomy.