The diagnostic role of preoperative blood tests in complicated appendicitis: A feasible approach to surgical decision.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
An accurate diagnosis and timely surgical intervention have significant importance in noncomplicated appendicitis (NCA) and complicated appendicitis (CA). Therefore, any factor that helps in the prediction of CA also contributes to suitable treatment options.
AIM: This retrospective study aimed to identify any relationship between acute appendicitis (AA) and preoperative blood test levels and whether these parameters can differentiate between NCA and CA patients.
PATIENTS AND
METHODS
A database of 201 appendectomies and 100 control healthy patients was analyzed between 2019 and 2022. Patients were divided into three groups: NCA without peritonitis or phlegmonous appendicitis as group 1; CA with perforated, necrotizing appendicitis with peritonitis as group 2; and the healthy control group (CG) as group 3. White blood cell (WBC), platelet distribution width (PDW), mean platelet volume (MPV), red cell distribution width (RDW), creatine kinase (CK), and bilirubin levels were collected from the patients and compared statistically between the groups.
RESULTS
Age, WBC, and PDW levels were set as predictive in the differential diagnosis of CA as a result of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that age (OR: 1.023; 95% CI: 1.000-1.045; P = 0.04), male sex (OR: 3.718; 95% CI: 1.501-9.213; P = 0.005), WBC levels (OR: 1.000; 95% CI: 1.000-1.000; P = 0.002), and PDW levels (OR: 2.129; 95% CI: 1.301-3.484; P = 0.003) were independently associated with CA.
CONCLUSION
Age, higher WBC count, and PDW levels are valuable in differentiating the diagnosis of CA from NCA, and this could be a feasible approach for surgical decisions.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.