MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/ptj/pzaa206

Медицинская библиотека · Physical therapy · 2021

Reliability and Validity of Physical Tools and Measurement Methods to Quantify Hand Swelling: A Systematic Review.

Llanos Catalina, Gan Ellen Yanxiang, Chen Jophie, Lee Mi-Joung, Kilbreath Sharon L, Dylke Elizabeth S

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Hand swelling may result from injury or trauma. Various physical assessment tools and measurement methods can be used to quantify the volume or size of the hand or fingers; however, the reliability and validity of each tool and measurement method have not been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of physical assessment tools and methods used to quantify hand and finger volume orsize.

METHODS

MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched using key terms related to swelling, edema, volume, size, hand, measures, reliability, and validity. Cross-sectional or longitudinal studies that assessed reliability and/or validity of physical assessment tools or measurement methods to quantify hand swelling were included. Two examiners independently extracted data from the included articles and appraised the articles' quality using the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments methodology. Data extracted from studies analyzing reliability and validity were grouped by type of assessment tool and measurement method.

RESULTS

Five physical assessment tools used for quantification of hand swelling were evaluated, including tape measure, water volumeter, bioimpedance spectroscopy, ring gauge, 3-dimensional techniques. All assessment tools had good to excellent reliability (ICC = 0.74 - 0.99), and moderate to high validity (Pearson coefficient = 0.58 - 0.99), for quantification of the volume or size of the hand or fingers.

CONCLUSION

All measurement methods with these tools had good to excellent reliability and moderate to high validity. The evidence underpinning the figure-of-eight technique, which uses a tape measure, was the highest. Because these physical assessment tools and measurement methods assess different aspects and regions of the hand, which one is selected depends on the region of interest for assessment and the availability of tools.

IMPACT: Reliable tools and measurement methods are available to measure the size or volume of the hand and fingers, either together or separately. The best tool will depend on the aim of assessment and tool availability.

LAY SUMMARY: Hand swelling can occur with injuries, burns, or lymphedema. This review shows that tools are available to accurately measure swelling in any part of thehand.

Для цитирования: Llanos Catalina, Gan Ellen Yanxiang, Chen Jophie, Lee Mi-Joung, Kilbreath Sharon L, Dylke Elizabeth S. Reliability and Validity of Physical Tools and Measurement Methods to Quantify Hand Swelling: A Systematic Review.. Physical therapy. 2021. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa206.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.