DOI 10.1016/j.ekir.2026.106367
Systematic Review of Immunosuppression After Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy for Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
The use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for relapsed or refractory posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) in solid organ transplant recipients is a rapidly evolving frontier in immunotherapy and transplantation. In this context, clinicians must carefully balance the competing risks of allograft rejection, the potential for maintenance immunosuppression to diminish CAR T-cell efficacy and treatment response, alongside an increased infection risk. Given the heterogeneous nature of PTLD and the scarcity of clinical trial data in this specific population, there is currently no established consensus regarding the optimal maintenance immunosuppressive strategy post-CAR T-cell therapy.
METHODS
To address this gap, we conducted a systematic review of published data pertaining to CAR T-cell therapy and PTLD after solid organ transplantation.
RESULTS
Our findings reveal substantial variability in immunosuppressive management before and after CAR T-cell infusion, including the withholding of immunosuppression, or the use of single agent or combinations of corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), antimetabolites, or mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors. Given the limited data to date, balancing these competing risks is challenging, and no single immunosuppression regimen has emerged as clearly superior.
CONCLUSION
Our review underscores the necessity of an individualized approach to these patients that accounts for factors such as CAR T-cell persistence and prolonged B-cell depletion, and highlights the need for further research on this clinical scenario.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.