La Radiologia medica · 1998
[Stenosis-occlusion of the carotid bifurcation. Angiography with MR and contrast media versus digital angiography].
Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Scarabino T, Carriero A, Balzano S, Sciannelli V, Bonomo L, Salvolini U
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the comparative sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE MRA) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the study of carotid bifurcation stenoses.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients with suspected cerebrovascular insufficiency by carotid stenosis were examined with CE MRA and DSA within 24 hours of each other. A 1.5 superconductive unit (Signa, General Electric) was used for CE MRA; fast spoiled gradient echo recalled (SPGR) images were acquired on the coronal plane 12 s after contrast medium injection, with the following parameters: TR/TE/FA 8/1/60, MA 256 x 128, NEX 1, FOV 18 x 13, slices/slab 28, slice thickness 1 mm, TA 32 s. The images were postprocessed with the maximum intensity projection (MIP) and the targeted MIP algorithms. A Siemens Politron 1000 VR unit was used for DSA examinations.
RESULTS: DSA diagnosed 21 true positives, namely 4 grade II, 4 grade III, 10 grade IV and 3 grade V stenoses. CE MRA scored 100% in stenosis identification and grading, accurately diagnosing all the true negatives and the true positives and was always in agreement with DSA as to stenosis site.
CONCLUSION: CE MRA can be considered the technique of choice to study stenosis occlusion in the epiaortic vessels, because it permits a rapid panoramic study of the neck vessels and accurate stenosis grading with similar patterns to those of DSA. Thus, CE MRA appears to be a valid alternative to DSA.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients with suspected cerebrovascular insufficiency by carotid stenosis were examined with CE MRA and DSA within 24 hours of each other. A 1.5 superconductive unit (Signa, General Electric) was used for CE MRA; fast spoiled gradient echo recalled (SPGR) images were acquired on the coronal plane 12 s after contrast medium injection, with the following parameters: TR/TE/FA 8/1/60, MA 256 x 128, NEX 1, FOV 18 x 13, slices/slab 28, slice thickness 1 mm, TA 32 s. The images were postprocessed with the maximum intensity projection (MIP) and the targeted MIP algorithms. A Siemens Politron 1000 VR unit was used for DSA examinations.
RESULTS: DSA diagnosed 21 true positives, namely 4 grade II, 4 grade III, 10 grade IV and 3 grade V stenoses. CE MRA scored 100% in stenosis identification and grading, accurately diagnosing all the true negatives and the true positives and was always in agreement with DSA as to stenosis site.
CONCLUSION: CE MRA can be considered the technique of choice to study stenosis occlusion in the epiaortic vessels, because it permits a rapid panoramic study of the neck vessels and accurate stenosis grading with similar patterns to those of DSA. Thus, CE MRA appears to be a valid alternative to DSA.