MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1128/aac.11.4.645

Медицинская библиотека · Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 1977

Therapy of antimicrobial-resistant typhoid fever.

Butler T, Linh N N, Arnold K, Adickman M D, Chau D M, Muoi M M

Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Antimicrobial-resistant typhoid fever in Saigon was studied by examining in vitro antimicrobial susceptibilities of Salmonella typhi strains and conducting a randomized clinical trial of ampicillin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ). Isolates of S. typhi were obtained from blood or stool cultures of 90 patients. Of 87 isolates tested for antimicrobial susceptibility, 65 (75%) were resistant (R) to chloramphenicol, streptomycin, sulfonamide, and tetracycline, and 22 (25%) were susceptible (S). The drug resistance was transferable to Escherichia coli and was found in 11 different Vi-phage types. All isolates were susceptible to ampicillin and to TMP-SMZ. Agar dilution studies of TMP and SMZ showed synergistic inhibition of growth in all 18 S isolates and in 12 of 48 R isolates tested. The clinical trial of ampicillin and TMP-SMZ showed that both drugs were equally effective. Treatment failure with both drugs was more frequent in patients with S isolates than in patients with R isolates. Therefore, in an area where antimicrobial-resistant typhoid fever exists, patients with R isolates should receive either ampicillin or TMP-SMZ, but patients with S isolates should be treated with chloramphenicol.

Для цитирования: Butler T, Linh N N, Arnold K, Adickman M D, Chau D M, Muoi M M. Therapy of antimicrobial-resistant typhoid fever.. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 1977. DOI: 10.1128/aac.11.4.645.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.